As per the detail of the case a property owner had entered into an agreement with a tenant and fixed a rent and how much it would increase every year. The tenant did not abide by the agreement and the property owner filed a suit. The court ruled in the favour of the property owner and awarded him mesne profits and damages with interest.
While filing the tax returns for the year the property owner claimed that the amount received from the tenant was not an income and should not be subjected to tax. The property owner claimed that this was capital receipt.
The tax department argued that the amount received was akin to income and should be subjected to tax. The tax department said that the money received was only after the lease contract was terminated and was not part of the rent.
The Delhi High Court observed that it was in lieu of the rent which the taxpayer would have otherwise derived from the tenant, that the mesne profits and interest thereon were awarded. Had it been a case where the capital asset would have been subjected to physical damage, or of diminution of the title to the capital asset, and damages would have been awarded under the head, there would have been merit in the taxpayer’s claim that damages received for harm and injury to the capital asset, or on account of its diminution, would be a capital receipt.
This ruling lays down that mesne profits received on account of unauthorised occupation of immovable property by a tenant constitutes revenue receipt, taxable under the income tax regulations, a Deloitte tax note read.